Q: I retired from the army in 1086 in Kansas and moved to N.C. How is my retirement taxed…Total minus disability? I read and hear so many things now. What is this Bailey lawsuit and what would that have to do with military retirement?
–Doyle, Vass, North Carolina
A: Well, if you retired in 1086, all I can say is: job well done! You have clearly maximized the income received through your military retirement (although I’m not sure what military you retired from?). All kidding aside, your move from Kansas to North Carolina should not change the taxation of your military retirement. In Kansas, military retirement is exempt from state income tax and, thanks to the Bailey case, you’ll get the same treatment in North Carolina.
Now let’s move to the history lesson. Back in 1989 the US Supreme Court ruled that Federal retirees could not be taxed differently than State retirees in the Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury case. Following that ruling, the North Carolina legislature repealed the state employees’ retirement tax exemption. However, in the Bailey vs. State of North Carolina case you mentioned the North Carolina Supreme Court ruled that those state retirees (and by virtue of the Davis case, federal and military retirees) who were vested in the retirement plan as of 8/12/89 could not be taxed. So, since you retired in 1986, your military retirement will not be taxed by North Carolina. Enjoy the golf!




Follow Us!